EN
Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Engineering & Operations · Operational decision · 2005–2006

Moriya Hamono cut work-in-progress by producing one packing box at a time

A Shimane blade maker stopped batch-pushing parts and switched to box-unit pull, shrinking months of WIP.

Moriya Hamono (守谷刃物研究所)

the move

Moriya Hamono, a precision steel-parts maker in Yasugi, Shimane, supplied power-steering parts, motor shafts and punches for the mint, yet its factory held more than three months' worth of work-in-progress. In 2005 it joined a factory-diagnosis tour run by a regional bank, where consultant Hidetoshi Yamada, known for rebuilding Canon and Sony plants, started his walk from the shipping dock—backwards through the line.

Yamada found parts piled on pallets in batches of about 900 pieces per process while the final packing step worked from a separate, overflowing store. His instruction: think in packing-box units, not lots. Make one box, inspect it, hand it straight to the next station—one box at a time instead of a day's or a lot's worth—and let the downstream process limit what flows.

The switch exposed that heat treatment loaded three lots per furnace while later processes could only consume one box, so output had to be paced to what the next process could actually take. That single change turned a 30–40 minute box through inspection and packing instead of letting work sit, shrinking the WIP mountain that had accumulated for years.

why it works

  • Box-unit flow eliminates the leftover fractions that become WIP
  • Making only what the next process can take forces balance across stations
  • Short lead times protect the company when big customers cut inventories
the payoffFlow in packing-box units, not batch lotsneat

what transfers

Batching hides problems; sizing production to the customer's unit—the box—exposes idle work and shrinks lead time without buying new machines.

what came after

The series documented Mori's factory in 2005–2006; the kaizen work continued across multiple visits, with the factory's own managers taking over leadership of the improvements after the consultant's initial guidance.

references

spotted an error? The archive wants to know.

same kind of clever