案例库 · 产品与设计 · 产品决策 · 2008
这条还没译成中文，下面是英文原文。
Stack Overflow paid in reputation and got the world's best programming library for free.
Reputation points and badges, unspendable but shown on every profile, motivated programmers to write millions of high-quality answers for free.
Stack Overflow · Stack Exchange
那一手
Question-and-answer forums usually die because experts will not answer strangers for nothing, and the older model either paid moderators or gated the answers behind a wall.
Jeff Atwood and Joel Spolsky built Stack Overflow in 2008 around reputation and badges; earning points from upvotes and displaying them beside every name is a powerful motivator even though the points cannot be cashed in.
Reputation also unlocks privileges, so heavy contributors become the people who edit, close and moderate without being paid staff, and the community runs itself.
A 2020 Management Science study found that after users land a new job they cut reputation-generating activity by 23.7% while cutting non-reputation activity by only 7.4%, evidence that the status and career motive is what drives the content.
为什么管用
- Reputation is a scarce, visible status that cannot be bought, so it commands effort.
- Privileges locked behind reputation turn each contributor into a moderator.
- Because answers are public, a strong record doubles as a recruitable career signal.
可以搬走什么
If you need free, high-quality volunteer work you cannot pay for, mint a scarce, visible status people value and gate community power on it, so the crowd both produces and governs the content.
后来呢
Stack Overflow became the largest programming Q&A in the world, and the reputation-and-privileges mechanics scaled into the Stack Exchange network of hundreds of sites. The design became the canonical example of paying contributors in status instead of money and was copied, in spirit, by many later communities that depend on volunteer effort.
资料来源
发现哪里写错了？告诉我们。