EN
Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Engineering & Operations · Strategic decision · 1996–1997

SCOR gave every supply chain five common processes: plan, source, make, deliver

PRTM and AMR founded the Supply Chain Council in 1996; its SCOR model standardized how companies describe, measure and benchmark their supply chains.

Supply Chain Council

the move

In the spring of 1996, two Boston consultancies—Pittiglio Rabin Todd & McGrath (PRTM) and AMR Research—founded the Supply Chain Council to help companies move from functional management to process management, and released SCOR (Supply-Chain Operations Reference-model) at the end of that year.

The model, built with about 70 world-class manufacturers, provides standard process definitions, terminology and metrics, structured in four levels and based on a plan–source–make–deliver framework. Stewart's 1997 paper introducing it calls SCOR 'the first cross-industry framework for evaluating and improving enterprise-wide supply-chain performance and management.'

Its power is the common scoreboard: a company can benchmark its processes against others using the same definitions and metrics, and software vendors can target one specification rather than every company's private vocabulary.

why it works

  • Fragmented terminology made cross-company comparison impossible.
  • Standard metrics let firms benchmark against best-in-class, not just themselves.
  • A common reference model guided software to fit manufacturers' needs.
  • Process-level language supported re-engineering instead of departmental silos.
the payoffDefine processes first; metrics followneat

what transfers

You can't improve what you can't name: an industry-wide process standard makes benchmarking and software interchangeable, turning supply-chain practice into something measurable and comparable.

what came after

SCOR became the reference supply-chain framework for industry and education worldwide, maintained by the Supply Chain Council and later the broader supply-chain profession, and it remains the model taught and cited in supply-chain management courses.

references

spotted an error? The archive wants to know.

same kind of clever