EN
Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · R&D & Science · Technical decision · 1975–1977

Sanger's chain-terminator method made reading DNA fast and accurate

Frederick Sanger stopped DNA copies at each base with dideoxy nucleotides, so fragment length revealed the sequence — faster and more accurate than before.

MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology

The solution

In 1975 Sanger and Coulson had published the 'plus and minus' method for reading DNA, but it was slow and error-prone. In their 1977 paper in PNAS they described an improvement: 2',3'-dideoxy and arabinonucleoside analogues of the normal nucleotides, which act as specific chain-terminating inhibitors of DNA polymerase.

The insight turns synthesis into a measurement: in four parallel reactions, each containing one dideoxy terminator, every newly made strand stops at a specific base. Separated by length, the collection of fragments spells out the whole sequence. The authors applied it to the genome of bacteriophage phiX174 and reported it 'more rapid and more accurate' than the earlier methods.

Chain-terminator sequencing became the dominant sequencing technology for two decades — the basis of the automated sequencers that read the human genome — and Sanger received his second Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 1980.

Why it worked

  • Chain terminators create a complete set of stopping points
  • Fragment length directly encodes base position
  • One simple chemistry replaced laborious degradation analysis
  • Easily automated, which enabled the genome era
What it achievedStop synthesis at each base; length encodes positioninspired

What can be applied

To measure where things are along a chain, create a ruler by stopping the process at every position — the fragment lengths do the measuring for you.

Aftermath

Applied Biosystems automated the method, and chain-terminator (Sanger) sequencing powered the Human Genome Project, remaining the gold standard for accuracy until next-generation sequencing took over in the late 2000s. Sanger won the 1980 Nobel Prize in Chemistry for the work.

Sources

spotted an error? The archive wants to know.

Related cases