EN
Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Marketing & Brand · Marketing decision · 2010–2019

Panera opened pay-what-you-can cafés to fight food insecurity

Panera Cares (2010) ran nonprofit cafés with suggested prices and donation bins; most closed, but the experiment revealed how PWYW fails.

Panera Bread

The solution

Panera's co-founder Ron Shaich wanted to use the company's restaurant skills to fight food insecurity. In 2010 the chain opened Panera Cares, a nonprofit café in Clayton, Mo. — a normal Panera menu, but no cash registers: prices were suggestions, customers dropped what they could into donation bins, and those who couldn't pay could volunteer an hour for a meal.

A second café opened in Dearborn, Mich., in November 2010. Early data from Clayton showed the mechanism at work: 20% of patrons gave more than the suggested donation, 60% gave about the same, and 20% left less. The suggested price acted as a strong anchor, and the café recovered a meaningful share of costs through generosity.

But the model never reached breakeven. Almost nine years in, every Panera Cares café had closed except Boston's, which still covered only about 85% of its costs. Academic research on the experiment found why: consumers felt discomfort being asked to price morality, and the food-insecure customers the café was meant to help felt demoralized dining alongside paying guests.

Why it worked

  • Donation bins removed the cash-register barrier for the poor
  • Suggested prices anchored most payments near the list price
  • The volunteer-for-meal option preserved dignity and labor
  • Consumers resisted being made responsible for food insecurity at the till
What it achievedSuggested prices anchor; generosity didn't cover costsneat

What can be applied

Pure pay-what-you-want fails when it feels like a handout: the suggested price anchors payments, and customers and the food-insecure feel discomfort — design the gift frame, not the price.

Aftermath

The Boston Panera Cares café kept running at a loss, and Shaich called the experiment a success despite the closures — it had tested whether conscious pricing could work at scale. The case became a standard example in pay-what-you-want research of how social framing, not just price, determines whether the mechanism works.

Sources

spotted an error? The archive wants to know.

Related cases