中文Log in
genius.wiki
Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Engineering & Operations · Technical decision · 1991–2000

Aviation Partners' blended winglets cut fuel burn up to 7% on existing jets

Winglets recover energy lost in wingtip vortices; Aviation Partners turned NASA's 1976 idea into certified retrofit kits that cut fuel burn on existing jets.

Aviation Partners

the move

Fuel is one of an operator's biggest costs, but replacing a jet to save fuel is unaffordable for most owners. In 1976 NASA's Richard Whitcomb showed in wind-tunnel tests that small, nearly vertical wing-tip surfaces substantially reduce drag at cruise by recovering energy lost to wingtip vortices.

Aviation Partners, founded in 1991, turned the idea into business: Louis Gratzer's blended winglet design was certified on the Gulfstream II in 1993, the Boeing Business Jet in 2000, and later Falcon and Hawker models through the 1999 Aviation Partners Boeing joint venture. The kit bolts onto existing wings, so no new aircraft is required.

The company reports up to 7 percent less fuel burn and says its winglets have saved billions of gallons of jet fuel, and blended winglets became the most-requested upgrade in business aviation — a visible sign of a well-kept aircraft.

why it works

  • Retrofit economics: the saving accrues on every flight of a plane the buyer already owns.
  • Certification on existing models removed the buyer's technical risk.
  • The blended curve avoided the drag penalty of sharp-angled winglets.
  • The Boeing joint venture opened the airliner installed base.
the payoffSell the fuel saving as a bolt-on for planes already ownedclever

what transfers

When the expensive fix is out of reach, find the cheap bolt-on that captures most of the benefit: a retrofit sells to the entire installed base instead of competing for new purchases.

what came after

Blended winglets became standard equipment on many business jets and common on airliners; the 737 MAX's split-scimitar tips and the Falcon 2000LX's standard winglets show how completely the retrofit idea became a factory option.

references

spotted an error? The archive wants to know.

same kind of clever