EN
Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Engineering & Operations · Operational decision · 2017–2021

ASML's time-stamp service concept cut extreme chip-tool outages 20%

Guaranteeing time-to-part instead of stock levels: ASML's redesigned service supply cut extreme long-downtime events 20%, worth an estimated €1.5B a year.

ASML

the move

ASML's chip-making machines are so expensive that unplanned downtime at a customer's fab is measured in lost semiconductor output. The company's service network keeps over 10,000 different components and modules in warehouses worldwide.

At the start of 2017 ASML began rethinking its after-sales service supply for the rare but disruptive long-downtime events that customers feared most. The new concept adds a 'time stamp' — an estimate of how long a part or tool takes to travel from the service network to a specific broken machine — and changes planning accordingly.

After successful pilots, the concept was rolled out to the worldwide installed base in 2020. The result: a 20 percent decrease in extreme long-downtime events, worth an estimated €1.5 billion a year to the semiconductor industry.

The work was recognized as a runner-up in the 2021 INFORMS Wagner Prize competition for operations-research practice.

why it works

  • Time-to-part, not stock availability, is what a fab actually cares about.
  • Focusing on rare extreme events targets the biggest cost, not the average.
  • A worldwide rollout proved the concept at industrial scale.
  • An estimated €1.5B yearly industry benefit made the case to customers.
the payoffGuarantee time to part, not part countclever

what transfers

For machines where a downtime day costs millions, time-to-part for rare failures beats average availability; redesigning the service promise around it cut the costliest outages by a fifth.

what came after

ASML rolled the new service-supply concept out worldwide in 2020; extreme long-downtime events fell 20 percent, worth an estimated €1.5 billion a year for the semiconductor industry, and the work was a 2021 Wagner Prize runner-up.

references

spotted an error? The archive wants to know.

same kind of clever