EN
Back to the archive

The encyclopedia · Product & Design · Product decision · 2023

Hana Bank stuffed pillows with shredded won so Koreans could sleep on wealth.

Korea discards 600M+ unfit banknotes a year; the Watermelon turned them into a 'Money Dream' pillow people want for luck.

Hana Bank

the move

South Korea destroys hundreds of millions of unfit banknotes a year, and none of it is recycled — a waste problem with no obvious use. The standard approach would be to recycle the notes as paper and run an eco campaign nobody notices.

the.WATERMELON turned the waste into a desirable product: a 'Money Dream' pillow whose filling is ground banknote waste blended with eco-material, using about 5 million won in notes per pillow.

The cleverness is attaching it to a belief people already hold: sleeping on money invites wealth. So the product is wanted for what it symbolizes, and the recycling happens as a side effect of that want rather than as a duty.

This reversed the normal logic — instead of nudging people to recycle more waste, the campaign created demand for the waste, which meant more discarded banknotes would be recycled without anyone feeling they were doing a chore.

why it works

  • It turns the waste into a product with meaning, not a burden
  • A cultural belief (wealth energy) supplies desire that recycling duty cannot
  • Demand for the pillow directly drives more notes recycled
  • It solves the waste problem and builds brand affection in the same move
the payoffTurn banknote waste into a luck-wish people buyclever

what transfers

Recycling fails when it asks people to care about something dull. Give the waste a meaning people want, and demand does the recycling; the good becomes a side effect they never thought about.

what came after

The campaign aimed to recycle about 20 tons (142.4 billion won) of unfit banknotes by the end of 2023, and in 2025 minting agency KOMSCO partnered with Hana Bank on banknote-and-coin by-product merchandise, continuing the model of making eco-friendly goods from currency waste.

references

spotted an error? The archive wants to know.

same kind of clever