In 2010, online retail in India was stuck on a payments problem. Credit cards and net banking reached a sliver of the population, and shoppers were asked to wire money to a website for goods they had never seen. Flipkart, the bookstore founded in October 2007 by two former Amazon employees, Sachin and Binny Bansal, was by July 2010 the country's largest book e-tailer, selling more than one book a minute — but most Indians could not, or would not, pay online. Waiting for card penetration meant waiting years for infrastructure Flipkart did not control.

Flipkart's answer was to move the transaction to the doorstep: cash on delivery, pay the courier after opening the box. 'Retail spending leans heavily towards cash, and in India the online payment systems are not very mature,' Sachin Bansal told Business Standard in July 2010. 'This deters people who are more comfortable with paying cash on delivery.' The model worked immediately — within two months COD was contributing as much as 30% of overall sales, and Flipkart expected it to pull in buyers from smaller cities where cards were scarcest.

The fix scaled with the market. By late 2016, about 70% of Indian e-commerce orders were still paid in cash, much of it from smaller towns; when demonetisation forced retailers to cap or suspend COD overnight, cash share dipped and then snapped back to 60-65% of orders within a year, with one logistics firm reporting 80% of deliveries paid in cash. Nandan Nilekani's verdict: one of the reasons Flipkart took off was cash on delivery, and solving that Indian problem was so effective that even Uber had to accept cash in India — a concession it makes almost nowhere else.

Make the courier the payment gateway.

Reversed risk: the buyer pays only after seeing the goods, so the unknown online shop carries the fraud risk instead of the customer — the trust deficit that killed prepayment simply disappears.

It required no new infrastructure: couriers already reached towns where banks and card terminals did not, so cash collection rode on logistics that existed anyway.

It matched how India actually paid. Retail spending leaned heavily on cash, so COD worked with habit rather than against it, converting the hesitant majority instead of educating them.

A local fix became a competitive edge: rivals abroad could not see the problem, and even Uber had to accept cash in India.

Attach the transaction to trust that already exists instead of waiting for payment infrastructure — and a fix for a local constraint becomes an edge global rivals cannot see.

COD became how India shopped online — about 70% of e-commerce orders in 2016 — so demonetisation hit hard: Flipkart capped cash orders at Rs 1,000 and Amazon India suspended cash. The disruption lasted months: by November 2017 cash was back to 60-65% of orders. Only in the UPI era did the balance shift; in October 2022 Walmart-owned Flipkart began charging a Rs 5 handling fee on COD, nudging customers to 'avoid this fee by paying online now' — the model's cash-handling economics were always expensive, and worth it for a decade anyway.

FOLLOW THE EVIDENCE

The sources

  1. Cash on delivery web.archive.org
  2. Flipkart took off because it brought in cash on delivery: Nandan Nilekani economictimes.indiatimes.com
  3. Flipkart, Amazon, Snapdeal limit cash on delivery option after Rs500 notes scrapped livemint.com
  4. COD payments at e-commerce firms back to pre-demonetisation levels livemint.com
  5. Online shopping via Flipkart? Now pay extra for cash on delivery orders livemint.com