The encyclopedia · Strategy & Leadership · Strategic decision · 2016–2017
The U.K.'s FCA let fintechs test in a regulatory sandbox; about 90% moved toward launch.
The FCA lets firms test products live under tailored rules; of the first cohort, around 90% moved toward a wider launch.
U.K. Financial Conduct Authority
the move
A fintech with a genuinely new product faces a dilemma: get full regulatory authorisation before proving the product, or launch without it and risk sanctions. The FCA's answer was a sandbox.
From June 2016 the FCA accepted applications; firms with a minimum viable product could test live with real consumers under a tailored authorisation or waivers, with a case manager and a written testing plan.
Of 69 applications in the first cohort, 24 were accepted, with 18 ultimately testing. The FCA's first-year review found about 90% of firms that completed testing moved toward a wider market launch, and around 40% raised investment during or after.
why it works
- A supervised trial lets a regulator learn a technology's real risks before rulemaking
- Temporary permission removes the all-or-nothing hurdle of full authorisation
- Public, agreed testing plans give consumers protection without killing the experiment
what transfers
Give innovators a supervised, testable space instead of demanding full compliance up front; the regulator learns what to regulate while the firm learns what sells.
what came after
The sandbox became the global template, in the U.K. and abroad, and the FCA later added a Digital Sandbox and a scalebox. Critics note that testing is resource-intensive and that its net effect on competition is hard to isolate, but the model spread to dozens of regulators.
references
- FCA used advisers to test robo-advice
- FCA announces 24 successful sandbox firms as part of Project Innovate
spotted an error? The archive wants to know.