On Indian Railways' shared network, passenger trains have priority by policy. The result on the Khurja–Kanpur trunk was freight crawling at an average of 25 km/h, with about 32 freight train pairs a day and further delay from level crossings — a service so slow and unreliable that high-value cargo fled to trucks.

Starting in 2011, the World Bank financed three projects on the Eastern Dedicated Freight Corridor (US$975 million, US$1.1 billion and US$650 million) alongside Indian government funding. The corridor was built to carry heavier axle loads at design speeds of 100 km/h, procured through India's first design-and-build lump-sum rail contracts, and operated by DFCCIL — a separate company with memoranda of understanding defining its revenue as an infrastructure manager, outside the parent railway's operating culture.

The separation worked where it opened: freight capacity on the Khurja–Kanpur section jumped from 32 to 100 train pairs a day, freight speed rose from 25 to 57 km/h (target 60), and — the quiet bonus — express passenger trains on the freed legacy trunk grew from 69 to between 128 and 136 a day by 2022-23. The gap is traffic: far below the planned 12.5 billion net ton-km at close, because the Japan-financed western corridor to Jawaharlal Nehru Port was not yet commissioned. The evaluators rated the outcome Moderately Satisfactory and expect the ramp-up as the network connects.

Separate the traffic instead of optimizing the queue

The bottleneck was the sharing rule, not track count: passenger priority made every freight slot unreliable, and unreliable freight cannot win cargo back from trucks.

A dedicated corridor with 25-tonne axle loads and double-stack clearance raises the productivity ceiling of every future train, not just the schedule.

DFCCIL's memorandum-based infrastructure-manager revenue let the corridor be run commercially without first winning Indian Railways' internal operating reform.

Design-and-build lump-sum contracting avoided the item-rate procurement culture that had stalled rail construction.

When one traffic class keeps losing the scheduling fight, don't re-optimize the queue — give it a system of its own. A corridor pays off only when both ends connect.

At project close in 2019, the remaining Khurja–Ludhiana section was still being commissioned with trains averaging 41 km/h. The 2024 ICR projects that speeds will approach the 60 km/h target and that throughput will exceed original forecasts, but only with a delay of several years, as traffic ramps up and the western corridor finally plugs the freight system into the country's largest container port.

FOLLOW THE EVIDENCE

The sources

  1. India - First, Second, and Third Eastern Dedicated Freight Corridor Project: Implementation Completion and Results Report (ICR00006390) documents.worldbank.org
  2. India - IN: Eastern Dedicated Freight Corridor-I: ICR Review (ICRR0024003) documents.worldbank.org