2ndOpinion.FYI中文
genius.wiki

#1407 2003 · Yeshasvini Trust / Karnataka Department of Cooperation · Health insurance / rural healthcare

A heart surgeon insured 1.6 million farmers by deducting premiums from their milk money

the problem

Farmers needed surgery they could not pay for; insurers could not reach or bill customers this poor and dispersed

background

In 2002 the cardiac surgeon Devi Shetty, who had just founded Narayana Hrudayalaya in Bangalore, ran field studies that found an unexpected bottleneck: private hospitals in Karnataka were running at utilization as low as 35 percent. The surgical capacity existed; the purchasing power did not. The insurance industry would not cover the informal poor for structural reasons — no payroll to deduct from, premiums too small to justify a collection visit, no data to underwrite — so the standard answers were charity camps or waiting for government schemes.

Shetty took the idea to A. Ramaswamy, Principal Secretary of Karnataka's Department of Cooperation, and the two found the missing piece: the state had roughly 26,000 functioning village cooperative societies — milk unions, credit societies, fisheries cooperatives — with about 19 million members. These societies already collected and paid out money to exactly this population, every month. The scheme was launched at the end of 2002, became operational in June 2003 under a charitable trust chaired by Shetty, and enrolled members through the cooperative hierarchy, which was given enrollment targets.

what everyone would do

Launch a rural insurance product with agents and branch offices, or wait for a government subsidy to make premiums affordable — both drown, because acquiring and billing a 60-rupee customer costs more than 60 rupees, and subsidy-dependent schemes stop growing when the budget does.

what they saw

The poor were insurable — the missing piece was a billing channel. The milk cooperative already reached every farmer monthly with cash in hand, so premiums rode milk payments: a risk problem solved as distribution.

the move

Membership was sold only through cooperative societies at 60 rupees a year (about 5 rupees a month): village society secretaries enrolled members and collected premiums, in instalments deducted from milk-sale payments where milk unions were involved. A member got cashless surgery — more than 1,600 procedures on a fixed price list set roughly 30 percent below market — up to 200,000 rupees a year at a network that grew past 150 hospitals, plus free outpatient consultations. There was no medical screening: anyone in a society could join, including the already ill, and hospitals accepted the discounted fixed prices because the volume filled idle operating theatres.

why it works

The village society secretary already records, collects and remits money, so enrolment and premium collection cost the scheme about 5 rupees per insured in its first year — less than a single posted letter from a city insurer. Trust transfers: a farmer who would never receive an insurance agent already transacts with the society. And a 60-rupee premium hidden inside a milk payment never competes with school fees at the kitchen table, so it survives mental accounting that would kill a cash demand. On the supply side, the fixed price list about 30 percent below market was acceptable to hospitals at 35 percent utilization because volume filled idle operating theatres; a pool of over a million members spread surgical risk thinly enough that only 0.56 percent claimed in year one; and cashless settlement removed the pay-first-claim-later barrier no poor household can bridge.

the payoff

1.6M members in year one; surgeries 9,047 to 60,668 by 2007-08 (Trust figures); evaluation found surgical out-of-pocket costs 46% lower

where it breaks

Voluntary enrolment invited adverse selection, and the evaluation found the sick joined disproportionately: by 2008-09 claims ran to 195.7 percent of premium and government subsidy had risen to 208.5 million rupees — the scheme only survived because the state topped it up. When the premium doubled to 120 rupees, membership fell from 2.2 million to 1.45 million, with renewal near 69 percent. It needs a healthy, trusted collector: where cooperative societies are politicized or decaying, the channel collapses with the scheme. And hospitals drift away from fixed prices once their theatres are full.

what came after

Other Indian states, including Rajasthan and Gujarat, moved to copy the scheme; the design — distribute insurance through institutions that already touch the poor weekly — recurs across India's later mass health schemes, and Narayana built its fixed-price surgical practice on the hospital network the scheme assembled.

references

  1. [1]Impact Evaluation of India's 'Yeshasvini' Community Based Health Insurance Programme (Working Paper No. 2)Global Development Network, 2009gdn.int
  2. [2]Yeshasvini Trust, Karnataka, India — Good and Bad Practices Case Study No. 20CGAP Working Group on Microinsurance, 2005findevgateway.org

Widely retold, only partly documented. Filed as hearsay.

keep it

Back to the archive