#315 2017 · Ska Brewing · Craft brewing
Ska Brewing, saddled with a five-year hops contract signed for a beer that flopped, brewed a new double IPA entirely from the leftover Galaxy and El Dorado hops and put the contract's own villain signing it on the label
问题
Multi-year forward hops contract left brewery with unsellable surplus
背景
Around 2011-2012, amid a broader hop shortage that sent prices soaring, Ska Brewing signed a five-year forward contract locking in supplies of Galaxy and El Dorado hops. In 2014 the brewery built its bet on those hops into a session IPA — but the beer sold poorly, leaving Ska on the hook for years of contracted hop deliveries it no longer had a product for.
Rather than quietly discount, resell, or eat the loss on the surplus, Ska's sales manager Arlo Grammatica proposed formulating a brand-new beer built entirely around the leftover hops and naming it after the mistake itself. The result, BHC (Bad Hop Contract) DIPA — an 8% ABV double IPA loaded with Galaxy and El Dorado hops — launched October 1, 2017, its label showing the brewery's cartoon villain 'Pinstripe' signing the doomed contract with a skeleton hand.
换别人会怎么做
The available options for a costly surplus from a failed forward-purchasing bet were the standard supply-chain responses, quietly discount the leftover hops, resell them at a loss to another brewer, or simply write off the expense and absorb the years of contracted deliveries as a sunk cost to be forgotten.
他们看到了什么
Ska's sales manager saw that the surplus hops weren't just a liability to dispose of, they were still a genuinely usable core ingredient that could anchor an entirely new product, and the embarrassing story behind the surplus, a five-year contract signed for a beer that flopped, was itself a distinctive, shareable narrative rather than something to hide. Rather than quietly absorbing the loss, the fix was designing a brand-new beer specifically built around consuming the leftover Galaxy and El Dorado hops and naming the product after the mistake itself, turning the surplus and the embarrassing story into the product's core identity.
那一手
Ska Brewing turned an over-committed, multi-year hops contract for an underperforming beer into the recipe and origin story for a new double IPA, using the surplus Galaxy and El Dorado hops as the beer's core ingredients and putting the bad contract itself — literally, a skeleton hand signing it — on the label.
为什么管用
Building BHC DIPA entirely around the surplus hops meant the beer's core ingredients cost Ska nothing beyond what it had already paid for through the original bad contract, converting a sunk cost into a genuinely low-marginal-cost new product rather than continuing to carry the surplus as pure loss. Putting the mistake itself on the label, literally depicting the brewery's cartoon villain signing the doomed contract, turned an embarrassing procurement error into a self-aware, honest brand story that generated brewery-driven press coverage framing the mistake as a punchline rather than a write-off, earned attention no conventional new product launch would have received on its own. This combination, using the surplus as free raw material and using the mistake itself as the marketing hook, is why BHC became one of Ska's permanent year-round releases distributed across ten states, converting what had been a pure financial liability into an ongoing, distinctive product line the brewery now treats as part of its identity.
值了多少
BHC DIPA became one of Ska's year-round, permanent lineup releases, distributed in six-packs and cans across ten states; it also generated brewery-driven press coverage that framed the purchasing mistake as a punchline rather than a write-off. No public unit-sales or dollar-recovery figures were disclosed.
什么时候会失灵
The mechanism depends on the surplus material genuinely being usable as a core ingredient in a product customers would actually want, not every excess inventory can be reformulated into something appealing, hops with genuine quality issues or a surplus of something with no viable new-product application would leave nothing to build around. It also depends on the underlying mistake being one a brand can comfortably own publicly without real reputational cost, a procurement error is a low-stakes, even charming admission for a craft brewery's irreverent culture, but a mistake involving genuine harm, safety, fraud, or serious customer damage wouldn't translate into the same kind of honest, humorous marketing hook. And this approach requires a brand voice and audience receptive to self-deprecating honesty, a company in a more risk-averse or reputation-sensitive category might find that publicly memorializing its own supply-chain mistake undermines customer confidence rather than building the same kind of goodwill it generated for a craft beer brand already known for irreverence.
后来呢
The beer became a running joke inside Ska itself — the brewery's CEO later described repeatedly signing 'bad hop contracts' as part of its M.O. — and BHC is still cited in craft-beer trade coverage as an example of a brewery mining its own supply-chain mistake for a permanent product rather than hiding it.
资料来源
- [1]Ska Brewing Uses Humor to Turn a Bad Hops Contract Into a BeerDenver Westword, 2017westword.com
- [2]Ska Brewing Releases BHC DIPAThe Full Pint, 2017thefullpint.com