案例库 · 战略与领导 · 战略决策 · 1992–2025
这条还没译成中文，下面是英文原文。
USFWS conservation banking turns protected habitat into credits developers can buy.
A landowner permanently protects habitat and the US Fish and Wildlife Service approves tradable credits developers buy to offset impacts.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service · The Nature Conservancy
那一手
The Endangered Species Act requires developers to offset harm to listed species' habitat, which often meant slow, piecemeal mitigation for each project.
Conservation banking reframed this: a landowner permanently protects and manages high-quality habitat for a species, and the US Fish and Wildlife Service approves a number of credits. The credits are then sold to project proponents who need to offset impacts to the same species elsewhere.
The buyer gets cheaper, better-scaled mitigation; the banker earns income while keeping the land; species get large, well-managed parcels. The Nature Conservancy, for instance, runs a bat conservation bank that protects two caves and 603 acres and sells credits to developers.
为什么管用
- A bank finances large habitat parcels up front, which beats tiny per-project offsets
- Credits shift the long-term responsibility for success from the project to the banker
- In-kind, off-site offsets give species benefits that scattered fixes cannot
可以搬走什么
Turn mitigation into a currency: let someone build a verified bank of habitat, sell credits, and the offset requirement funds landscape-scale conservation instead of ad hoc fixes.
后来呢
Conservation banking became a standard tool under the Endangered Species Act and is tracked in the national RIBITS system. It is not without criticism — some argue credits can be priced too low or placed where they deliver little — but the market has protected large contiguous habitat that piecemeal mitigation never would have.
资料来源
发现哪里写错了？告诉我们。