EN
返回档案库

案例库 · 财务与会计 · 财务决策 · 2004

这条还没译成中文,下面是英文原文。

Save More Tomorrow tied savings to future raises, not to today.

Thaler and Benartzi's SMarT plan commits employees to save a share of each future raise; saving rates rose from 3.5% to 13.6%.

University of Chicago · UCLA Anderson School of Management

那一手

In defined-contribution plans, employees decide how much to save, and many save too little because of self-control and a bias toward today. Thaler and Benartzi wanted a prescriptive program rather than another warning.

Their answer was Save More Tomorrow. At enrollment a worker agrees that their contribution rate will rise with each future salary increase, by a fixed amount, until it reaches a ceiling. Nothing changes today, so joining is painless, and the increases are automatic, so staying requires no effort.

The first implementations were striking: in the flagship program 78% of those offered joined, 80% stayed through four raises, and average saving rates climbed from 3.5% to 13.6% over 40 months. The mechanism turned a difficult present decision into a nearly effortless future one.

为什么管用

  • Present bias makes current-income saving painful
  • Taken from a raise, the increase never feels like a cut in take-home pay
  • Automatic escalation removes the need for repeated willpower
  • Inertia then keeps the saver enrolled through multiple raises
值了多少Commit future raises to saving, not current income神来之笔

可以搬走什么

To beat present bias, take the sacrifice from future money and let inertia work: a commitment device outperforms a one-time exhortation.

后来呢

Save More Tomorrow became the blueprint for automatic escalation in retirement plans, and its logic informed the Pension Protection Act of 2006, which encouraged auto-enrollment and automatic contribution increases. Such defaults are now standard in US defined-contribution plans.

资料来源

发现哪里写错了?告诉我们。

同一路聪明